Bar Malta?

Posted in 1 by Editor on May 24, 2010

Martinelli? Never heard of him.

The news of Nick Clegg’s reference to Malta appears to have tickled just about everybody’s fancy on our (bitter) sweet isle. The Lib Dem leader and UK’s new Deputy Prime Minister spoke in the late morning of Tuesday, May 19 at the City and Islington College Centre for Business, Arts and Technology, which venue is very helpfully described by Ann Treneman of The Times of London – who was there and was evidently not impressed – as “a sixth-form college just off Holloway Road in North London, which may be home to the most kebab shops in Britain”.

Mr Clegg began his speech setting out the government’s plans for political reform – focusing on what The Liberal Democrat Voice (an unofficial website run by a collective of Lib Dem bloggers) calls “three more Rs: repealing infringements on freedom, reforming politics and redistributing power” – at about 11.15 a.m. British Summer Time. He was late, again helpful Ms Treneman informs us, adding that this seems to be a habit with the man. “Clegg-time,” she announces, “runs about 15 minutes behind BST.”

Be that as it may, The Liberal Democrat Voice launched the full and unexpurgated speech online at 2.21 p.m. of the same day and by 5.34 (our time), industrious little Maltastar had already picked the reference to Malta and came out with the story. The parting shot: “Malta has been branded the most centralised country in Europe by the new Deputy Prime Minister of the UK, Nick Clegg.” The morning after, this newspaper caught up and announced that “Nick Clegg, the UK’s Liberal Democratic deputy Prime Minister, yesterday labelled Malta as the most centralised country in Europe.”

The not-so-subtle difference between “branding” and “labelling” Malta as the most centralised country in Europe will not be lost on those familiar with our own political universe. That, however, is not the issue here. What did the Liberal Democrat member for Sheffield Hallam (with 27,324 votes, the choice of 53.4 per cent of electors from this largely rural constituency and term-time home to a considerable student population studying at Sheffield and Sheffield Hallam universities) actually say about Malta?

If you really want to get to the bottom of this, the best thing you can do is read the full text on The Liberal Democrat Voice. Go to libdemvoice.org and look for A Power Revolution: Nick Clegg’s “New Politics” Speech. Malta is mentioned once in the text totalling 2,415 words. What does the Lib Dem leader (since 2007) say about our fair isle, meaning the Maltese islands, not the idyllic rock 25 miles south west of the southern tip of the Shetland mainland in Northern Scotland, home to one of Britain’s best managed small communities and renowned for its successful application of principles of environmental sustainability?

The man – a former journalist and MEP – said: “Britain was once the cradle of modern democracy. We are now, on some measures, the most centralised country in Europe, bar Malta.” To which Ms Treneman of The Times, again most constructively, retorts: “Bar Malta? Only a former MEP who is also a Lib Dem would care. I can hear the Libs now: ‘My God, we can’t be as centralised as Malta, let’s have a power revolution.'”

Significantly, in the summary of the speech published by the Liberal Democrats’ official website libdems.org.uk immediately after it was delivered, the reference to Malta is omitted. I very much doubt that the official site of the junior party in Britain’s shining new coalition government censored its leader’s first big speech as Deputy Prime Minister to avoid diplomatic trouble with Lawrence Gonzi’s government. The more sober and realistic explanation is that the reference to Malta was not central to the message and could, therefore, be safely cut. Meanwhile, I would not worry, as one J. Martinelli commenting online on this paper seems to do, that this episode “doesn’t bode well for future relations with Britain’s coalition government”. How provincial!

The key to understanding the reference to Malta lies in an article by Mr Clegg himself in The Independent the day after the speech, available online on www.independent.co.uk. He again refers to Malta in the context of his plea for a “radical devolution of fiscal powers” intended to reverse a situation where “up to 80 per cent of all local government funding comes from central government”. Only Malta beats Britain on this score. We are fiscally more centralised because the power of taxation and of expenditure is as good as completely in the hands of central government. The Lib Dems want more fiscal power for local government.

In Malta, only fools would rush to thread on such dangerous terrain. In a country where – let’s admit it – most are not at all comfortable with how central government is exercising its fiscal powers, the good sense of calling for a radical devolution of fiscal powers to local councils is not at all obvious. Mr Clegg’s argument, however, is part of a broader concern with the centralisation of power generally and this is an issue that is very relevant to us. His concern with more open and accountable government should be the concern of all decent citizens in our country. Too much is invisible and unknown to the voter, to the taxpayer, to the consumer of public services.

This article appeared in Dr Vella’s regular column on The Times Of Malta on May 24, 2010. The original can be retrieved from http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20100524/opinion/bar-our-bitter-sweet-fair-isle


5 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Monalisa said, on May 24, 2010 at 2:55 pm

    Dear Nick, little do you know how right you are. To you, it may simply have been a statistical comparison, but Malta is actually an extremely centralised, controlled little place. I’m not talking about taxation, education, local government or health services, but rather about the widespread patronage that rules our daily lives- from getting one’s grandmother a place in a state care home to snagging a job with some government entity to – when the odds are completely against you – winning a lucrative government tender or getting planning permission for a controversial development project. So please don’t apologise to Malta , ask anyone in the street and you will soon get an important education about our very own brand of centralisation.

  2. Ninu Carabott said, on May 24, 2010 at 3:21 pm

    @ Monalisa


  3. Patrick Brincat said, on May 24, 2010 at 3:26 pm

    Jokes apart, who is this guy J. Martinelli who predicts that this episode “doesn’t bode well for future relations with Britain’s coalition government”? I thought this sort of attitude belonged to the 70s? Do such dynosaurs still roam our landscape?

  4. Jerry Falzon said, on May 24, 2010 at 3:31 pm

    @ Patrick Brincat

    What’s weird is that Martinelli seems to be a Nationalist writing from Canada! I am sure that back in the 70s he would have been one of those criticizing Dom Mintoff for his ultimatum to Britain!

  5. Lara Metelli Xuereb said, on May 24, 2010 at 3:43 pm

    @Patrick Brincat and Jerry Falzon

    J. Martinelli is a Maltese Canadian who has been very aptly defined as “the self-appointed Minister for Favourable Propaganda from across the ocean” in a comment by correspondent Wally Vella-Zarb on The Times of Malta online on 23/3/10 (see http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20100323/local/enemalta-planning-to-sell-9-000-surplus-meters). Patrick, how ironic that you should have mistaken him for an old school Labourite from the 1970s.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: