Not all is well at Elsinore

Posted in 1 by Editor on April 30, 2009

You may recall that on January 19 of this year, in my first piece for this column, I invited readers not to hide their head in the sand. “Anybody with even the most rudimentary of political antennas,” I wrote, “has intercepted signals that indicate that we are approaching a zone of severe turbulence.” I also remarked that the Prime Minister’s inability to look relaxed and self-confident fuelled widespread suspicion that all is not well at Elsinore.

It’s April 27 and it’s not getting any better. Now if you consider that the Nationalist Party has a great record of keeping up appearances even when the ship is sinking, then we should consider the possibility that the PN is not all there. Certainly it is a far cry from the “one for all and all for one” movement that brought down Labour in the 1980s. If anything, it reminds me of Labour itself in its worst moments. The run up to the 1987 election is a case in point.

I disagree with those that reduce the whole situation to a matter of parliamentary arithmetic. What take place in the House of Representatives and environs are mere surface phenomena. They are the reflection of seismic processes deep below the political crust. Whatever is wrong in the PN is happening away from the lazzi and the burle of Malta’s political commedia dell’arte with its Arlecchinos and Truffaldinos, its Brighellas and Pantalones, its Pedrolinos and Capitani, its Scaramuccias and Tartaglias, its Signoras and Colombinas.

It is unfolding at the level of civil society, in its innards and entrails. That is where we have to look if we are to understand what is happening to the party that has ruled this country for 20 out of the past 22 years. It is in the viscera of our society that we have to conduct our enquiries. If you do, you will find that the PN can no longer rely on the automatic support of social groups and networks that have traditionally backed it as a matter of course. The Stamperija – as many of its former militants still fondly and nostalgically refer to the Pietà Dar Ċentrali (headquarters) – has taken them for granted for far too long.

The less articulate among them, when approached, shut themselves in an embarrassed and embarrassing silence. They are hurt by the attitude of their party’s bureaucrats who add insult to injury when they explain away the apathy of former activists with tired old clichés. The stock Pietà explanation is that it is only a bunch of ungrateful grumblers who get what they want (jinqdew) nine times out of 10 but threaten to tear up their vote because you can’t satisfy their tenth request for a pjaċir (favour).

The more articulate among them, on the other hand, kick the insult back to sender and turn the diagnosis on its head. “When we complain to Pietà about this or that issue – not personal issues, not requests for favours but about problems that are causing a haemorrhage of votes – nine times out of 10 we are ignored and in the one out of 10 cases when we get to voice our concerns, we are told that the government knows what it’s doing.”

It is not only many of the older rank and file that are profoundly disillusioned with “their” party and with the insensitive attitude of its apparatchiks – “arroganti u injoranti”, as one angry senior citizen put it – but, increasingly, its younger members, students in the first place. It is as if a spell has been broken. Blind quasi-tribal political faith driven by clientelism has not, however, quite disappeared. Whether we like it or not it still constitutes the flesh and sinews of politics in Malta.

It will not “… melt, thaw, and resolve itself into a dew” of its own accord. It will take a lot of guts and hard work to transform the fidili (the tongue-in-cheek ambiguity of the vernacular is fascinating) into politically-discerning citizens who will not be taken for granted. But the first tremors are being felt. If you put your ear to the ground you will hear muffled but unmistakable subterranean rumblings.

Let’s be as clear as we can. This concerns all parties. The change that a growing number of Maltese and Gozitans want will impact all current and wannabe political practitioners at all levels: local, national and European. If the saints refuse to go marching out, the former faithful will march out on them… and if, when this happens, the saints don’t get out of the way, they may well be trampled upon. Metaphorically, of course.

This article appeared in Mario Vella regular column on The Times of Malta. You can read the original and reactions to it at http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20090427/opinion/all-is-not-well-at-elsinore



2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Jesmond Curmi said, on April 30, 2009 at 10:44 pm

    This is what one Alex P Galea posted under Dr Vella article in The Times:
    “I am not so rash as to dip into the cauldron of Maltese politics. Therefore, I shall refrain from commenting on the content of Mario Vella’s article. However, just to say that, in spite of the subject, I surprised myself by reading it to its end in enjoyment of his English writing, which is a refreshing change from the usual turgid output of political columnists.” Let’s reflect on this. Unfortunately many Labour activists and supporters are not as good as Dr Vella when it comes to writing in the English language. They don’t have to be but they should, at the very least, be trained to write correctly. Thanks to our colonial past, our middle classes are accustomed to be ruled by persons whose command of language (the language of the colonial power, English) was almost always much better than their own. They have – unconsciously perhaps – inherited the conviction that only those with a superior command of English are fit to govern. Needless to say, they will forgive most Nationalist politicians for their less than competent handling of English, but not Labour ones. This is why we should leave no stone unturned to make sure we require all Labour public speakers and Labour journalists and PR professionals to speak and write good English.

  2. John Pellicano said, on May 1, 2009 at 6:23 am

    That the PN is approaching a zone of severe turbulence is, I think, well known by everyone. The writing on the wall is for everyone to see. At this stage, however, should the PL just wait for the “ungrateful grumblers” to increase in numbers and simply not vote PN until, instead of us overtaking them, they grind to a halt or should we convince more people that our policeis are better and thus gain more votes? I opt for the latter, but the question is, how is it to be done?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: