watersbroken

Din l-art helwa, jew qabar mbajjad?

Posted in 1 by Editor on January 10, 2009

“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but within they are full of dead men’s bones and all uncleanness. So you outwardly appear righteous to men, but within you are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.” Matthew 23:27-28

 

An eloquent indication of just how morally rotten and corrupt are the networks of power that ultimately control din l-art helwa, is given to us by the confirmation that no charges will be brought against those lawyers and other go-betweens involved in the attempts to buy the silence of the family of a 14-year-old girl from Nadur, Gozo, at the centre of rape allegations.

 

In a letter sent to The Sunday Times reacting to an article published last November, police said they had investigated the case and found no “breaches of the law”.  The girl’s family, however, say that neither they, nor other key witnesses who could confirm the facts, were ever interviewed by the police regarding allegations that no less than two attempts were made to convince them not to pursue the matter.

 

Last September, The Sunday Times had courageously revealed that a lawyer, close relatives of the accused, as well as a priest who acted as an intermediary, had persuaded the victim’s mother to sign a contract stating that members of her family would not take the case to court in return for €7,000 in “psychological support”. The victim’s family, the newspaper states, were never given a copy of the contract.

 

The four defendants, all under house arrest, are Peter Paul Said, Josef Said – who stand accused of rape – and Mark Lorry Said and Peter Paul Debono – who were charged with her defilement.  The contract did not prevent the victim’s family from pressing ahead.  On the day the men were due to be arraigned, however, according to the mother, two lawyers – one from Gozo and another from Malta –  approached her with the intention of coming to “an arrangement”.

 

The girl’s mother told The Sunday Times that she told the police inspector in charge of the investigation about the contract as well as of the second attempt to stop the claims from reaching the courts. The police neither confirmed nor denied the woman’s claim. They merely said  that police reports are not public documents.

 

Chief Justice Vincent DeGaetano brought up the issue of interference when, last October, he imposed stricter bail conditions on the defendants, arguing that there appeared to have been “manoeuvres by people who had an interest to see that the case does not reach the courts”.  “It seems that,” he added, “before the accused were charged in court, money changed hands in order for there to be a withdrawal of the complaint (in respect of the accused bearing the Said surname)”.

 

Labour MP Evarist Bartolo, who made PQs about the case to the minister of Home Affairs (including a request to name the lawyers concerned), told The Sunday Times that he thought “… the law is being used to protect those who are strong and powerful rather than those who are weak and vulnerable. It continues to protect the culture of omertá (code of silence) we have in our country. […] It’s symptomatic of a sick society”. The honourable Minister declined to comment, saying there were pending court proceedings.

 

See Mark Micallef’s report “No charges over attempts to buy rape girl’s silence.
Key witnesses insist they have not been interviewed”, The Sunday Times, January 4, 2009
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20090104/local/no-charges-over-attempts-to-buy-rape-girls-silence

Advertisements

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Tony Galea said, on January 11, 2009 at 4:22 pm

    Shame on the priest who tried to buy the girl’s mother’s silence! He should be named and shamed. He is not worthy of being a priest! And where is the Bishop of Gozo? Has he taken steps to discipline this black sheep?

  2. Elizabeth Mallia said, on January 11, 2009 at 4:27 pm

    The Chamber of Advocates should pronounce itself about the legality and the ethics of warranted legal practitioners attempting to bind the victim’s relatives with a contract preventing them from pressing ahead against those accused of raping and defiling the Gozitan girl. Why don’t they?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: